Loading page
Loading page
PipDig adheres to strict guidelines to preserve editorial integrity to help you make decisions with confidence. Some of the reviews and content we feature on this site are supported by affiliate partnerships from which this website may receive money. This may impact how, where and which companies / services we review and write about. Our team of experts works to continually re-evaluate the reviews and information we provide on all the top Forex / CFD brokerages featured here.
Fusion Peak Markets and Pacific Royal FX are illustrative sample records, not real firms. This page demonstrates how a head-to-head comparison is laid out.
Raw-style pricing with no minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
A $5 minimum deposit with strong education for new MetaTrader users
| Compare | Fusion Peak MarketsSample data | Pacific Royal FXSample data |
|---|---|---|
| Regulators | ASIC, VFSC | CySEC, IFSC, FSCA |
| Year Established | 2017 | 2009 |
| Execution Type(s) | ECN/STP | Market Maker |
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $5 |
| Average Trading Cost EUR/USD | 0.2 pips + $4.50 | 1.6 pips |
| Average Trading Cost GBP/USD | 0.4 pips + $4.50 | 2.1 pips |
| Average Trading Cost Gold | $0.16 | $0.55 |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Trading Platform(s) | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
| Islamic Account | ||
| Negative Balance Protection | ||
| Visit Broker | Read Review |
Fusion Peak Markets takes the overall win with a score of 4.8 against 4.2. Fusion Peak Markets is the cost leader of this list: raw spreads from 0.0 pips with a modest commission, no minimum deposit, no inactivity fee, and every major platform supported.
That said, Pacific Royal FX remains the better choice for some traders: a $5 minimum deposit with strong education for new metatrader users. Compare the account types and confirm which legal entity would onboard you before deciding.
Read the full Fusion Peak Markets review →
Read the full Pacific Royal FX review →